Natural selection? Critics say Zinke’s national monument review resembles a reality TV show

In many respects, the Trump

35r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	35r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

33r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	34r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

31r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	32r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

29r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	30r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

27r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	28r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

25r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	26r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

23r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	24r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

21r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	22r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

1r angi END DARJ UZNE UU	2r angi END DARJ UZNE UU

administration’s second look at national monuments across the country is playing out less like a typical government review and more like a season of “Survivor.”

So far, four monuments have been spared, while a fifth — the sprawling Bears Ears National Monument in Utah — has been recommended for massive cuts. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, has rejected the idea of issuing one comprehensive study at the end of his work and instead is announcing winners and losers as he goes.

The most recent announcement was Wednesday afternoon, when Mr. Zinke said he believes the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument should be left alone.

“I am recommending to the president that no changes be made to the monument,” he said. “The monument is one of the only free-flowing areas of the Missouri that remains as Lewis and Clark saw it more than 200 years ago.”

Critics argue that such an announcement is a wholly inappropriate way of treating the entire process and one that harks back to President Trump’s history with reality TV, with individual contenders being allowed to stay or being dismissed on an almost weekly basis.